The Art of the Remix, My initial experience was trying to paraphrase material using an algorithm. This happened around 2018, when it used an ineffective article spinner that substituted synonyms. The result was a disaster. It has made one sentence like The cat sat on the mat become The feline was lying on the floor cover. It was crudely noveland unintelligible nonsense.
And leap today, and here you will find the picture has changed under our feet. I worked in a content management role at tech startups and lifestyle publications over the last 2 years, and the point is that content death is approaching everyone.
The 2019 blog posts on our websites are filled with outdated and unoriginal material. Whether one will be able to duplicate articles with the help of AI is no longer the question of laziness but the question of managing assets. It is a question of turning a B-minus article into an A-plus one without necessarily spending 10 hours to produce an article of similar quality.
There are, however, correct and very wrong ways of doing it. The thing is, you will be beaten up if you consider AI as a copy-and-paste-and-publish robot. The robotic syntax will move your reader,s,, andGoogle’s friendlyly content algorithms will bury your dead body. The second is the experience of using AI as an editor and supporting the human component. Instead, it employs an amine process to solve the problem.
The Strategy: Refreshing or Spinning.
When attempting to do something, we should begin by defining what we are talking about. The SEO business is very different in terms of synergy and renewal.
- Spinning (stolen article) is a procedure of stealing an article, entering it into an AI to rephrase its text, and publishing it. Do not do this. It will not represent a new value; it will be immoral, as it is so opposite to copyright (although it will be legally ambiguous), and in most instances will result in empty content.
- Refreshing (or Remixing) involves paraphrasing (or reformatting) your current success, but not doing well in the market and/or in your research notes, and having AI reformat, refresh, and refine the text.
- In some cases, when reading an outdated article that needs to be redefined, I struggle to achieve my goal across three dimensions: Currency (is it up-to-date?), Structure (is it easy to read?), and Tone (does it sound like us?).
Phase 1: The stage in which we dismantle the beast ( Do Not Feed the Beast All at Once). An example of a rookie mistake is submitting a 2,000-word article, pasting it into an LLM (Large Language Model), and asking it to paraphrase it.
The AI will nearly always produce a hallucination, overlook crucial points, and summarise the text rather than copy it. It gets overwhelmed.
My approach is modular. In the original paper,, I have divided it into its framework:
- The Hook/Intro
- Key Argument A
- Key Argument B
- The Conclusion
I rewrite section by section. This will also help check the facts along the way. In cases where the initial article cites a 2021 statistic, I would not have the AI repeat it; instead, I would like the AI to identify a 2024 statistic and replace it.
Phase 2: Fineness and touch Prompt engineering.
Rewrite of this command as its generic version provides the so-called Corporate Vanilla voice. It employs the terms delve, landscape and unleash. It is like a press statement.
Prompting that is persona-constrained is needed to rewrite it in a human way.
The outline I apply in my everyday life is as follows:
I am publishing an extract of a blog entry on [Topic]. Rewrite this section to be concise and to the point.
Constraints:
- Use short sentences.
- Buzzwords like ‘game-changer’ or ‘digital landscape’ are not to be used.
- Be considerate and commanding simultaneously.
- Maintain original form (bullets/headings).
Here is the text: [Paste Text].”
It restricts drawing out the AI’s transitions beyond its default forms. I have a habit of requesting that it be phrased as a toiling detective or a neighbour to assist, to entice it into any intriguing metaphors, which I can subsequently decorate at a later stage.
Phase 3: The H.S. Workflow: The Human Sandwich.
A Human-AI-Human sandwich is the most straightforward and most effective way to paraphrase content.
1. The Human Slice (Preparation)
I have the old article, and I have mentioned it in it. I would highlight and spell: it is a bog-snarling sort of description. This will be adequate based on a comparison of making a cake. I am thinking on a higher level. Artificial intelligence is no more than a mason, and I am the designer.
2. The AI Filling (Drafting)
I use the tool to type in the notes and the original text. The AI has the teddy work of sentence structure and grammatical progression. It connects the dots.
3. The Human Slice (The Polish)
This is the most challenging step. I get the text, and it appears clean – it is too clean. It lacks grit.
I do read deliberately and violate grammar. I begin sentences with a, b, or but. I included some ambiguous comments (that is, people’s manner of speaking). I check every single fact. If the AI tells me the software will cost me $10/month, I check the pricing page. AI is an arrogant hoax; it will invent facts to beautify the sentence structure.
A Real-Life Case Study: The SEO Guide Review.
One of the guides on On-Page SEO that I wrote last year was relevant, but needed to be rewritten the previous month. The main principles were the same, but the situation was different.
The introduction comprised three paragraphs on Google’s history. Boring.
I entered the AI with the previous intro and the following set of instructions: Make an update to this to respond to the urgent need of an entrepreneur who is losing traffic. Cut the history lesson.
Make it urgent.” The output was sharp. Instead, it employed the following message: In the age of modern digital time, it is a luxury, a cliché, that I hate. I have deleted it manually as well, inserted an explicit reference to the revenue loss, and proceeded to the subsequent section. The entire procedure took 45 minutes. It would have required four hours of writing.
The Ethical Reality Check and the SEO Reality Check.
We have to talk about Google. Is it inappropriate to reformulate articles with the help of AI?
We have to talk about Google. Is it improper to make amendments to articles withthe assistance of AI? Google has clarified that they have no interest in the developing industry, resting really on the end result.
They punish, however, non-original goods. When you rewrite an article and leave it close enough so that you have nothing new to enter in it, you are walking on thin ice.
My rule of EEAT (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness): When creating a technical description using AI, I will need to add a personal touch. To illustrate this, I will include a paragraph about my experience using a lens in low light after the AI tells me how to use it. It is the Experience part of EEAT, which
In conclusion: King of the Editors.
New-century art is not composition, it is editing. AI will provide you with a set of prose that will make you satisfied, but not a soul. Power tools are reinterpreting the article using AI.
When left in the hands of an incompetent man, it turns into a fudge of factless, visionary spiderwebs. The last optimisation of effectiveness, but with a master doing it, is final.
It allows you to carry your brilliant ideas, sharpen them, and bring them to a new set of people with fresh perspectives. Don’t let the AI drive the car. You drive. Switch on the radio with the artificial intelligence.
The frequently asked questions are the FAQs.
Does Google punish me because of the implementation of AI in the process of paraphrasing the articles?
A: Not inherently. Google benefits by eliminating redundant and useless content. It does not alter the product in any way, regardless of the mode of production, so long as your reformed article is right, contains original value, and is of service to the user.
I can cut a URL and paste it to an AI, and can they get the device to re-create the entire product?
A: You can, but you shouldn’t. The performance is typically superficial, quiet and voiceless. To be precise and of good quality, it will be much more effective to proceed section by section.
What can I do to make the AI not sound robotic?
A: Prompts (e.g., write in a conversational and light-hearted style, write short sentences, avoid the use of jargon). Hand editing should always give output information in the form of human idioms and anecdotes.
Do you plagiarise when you recreate an article that is owned by an individual with the help of AI?
A: To have the words used differently and still to hide the source of the sentence, which is plagiarism (and unethical), in case you steal the ideas of another man, you make it your own sentence by sentence. Examples of situations where AI could be used include rewriting existing information or synthesising information from several sources to create new material.
Is it possible to have rules forhandling facts and statistics in rewriting old material?
A: More Auto-updating with AI: Never. I regularly hallucinate numbers, manually rete the existing data, feed it into the artificial intelligence, and request that it replace the old numbers with the new ones.